Wednesday, August 24, 2016

What a world....

You are pro birth like many others and not pro life. Here are the 3 questions I ask the many “pro-lifers”
1) Do you donate to any pro life organizations that help with unwanted babies?
2) Children need figures in their lives that will Mentor them and help them develop socially and emotionally (i.e loving parents). Now before I go on I’ll say this, I understand there are parents now that don’t provide that however,I’ll argue and say that those parents went in thinking they will provide all that and unconditional love while the people that want abortions know that they won’t so don’t try to use that argument. Anyways, would you be willing to be a mentor to these unwanted children during your free time without pay?
3) Many of these unwanted children are in a vicious cycle of being adopted and then “returned” or never get a chance to be adopted. The orphanages don’t have money to provide them with healthy and nutritious meals, clothing, and even safety. Things like this require money …so are you willing to have our taxes raised so the government can better equipp these orphanages?
You see what I mention requires actual work involved. Many pro lifers are all talk with no action. This is why I call you all part time pro lifers or just pro birth. Have you ever asked “I wonder what happened to those unwanted born children? Of course not, because if it’s out of sight it’s out of mind. I give you credit for no longer performing abortions, and your form of action is teaching about preventative measures. However, what are you doing to contribute to the many that were never wanted and those people who were forced to have that child?
Lastly, there is potential for life to exist after conception. Yes, I know cells will signal to develop a brain, heart, liver etc… but before it does it is just a culmincation of cells. You are creating guilt for something that hasn’t even developed. You manipulated the facts using your knowledge on human physiology. FACT baby is inside the woman. FACT 2 the baby needs the mother has a host (until we have the tech that won’t require this). Maybe that’s what you part time pro lifers should do. Invest money to a group of scientist that can develop a machine that can host the unwanted culmination of cells.
(P.s this article is very well written as opposed to mine because I’m typing on my phone, quickly, if I may add. Judge the 2 opposing views by the points mentioned and not by punctuation or sentence structure. )
  • Fred,
    I’ll be happy to answer your questions.
    1) Yes. Substantially.
    2 & 3) Red herrings. Your questions have nothing to do with the question, “Is this a life?” or “Is abortion murder?” Otherwise, the logical extension of your inquiry is that killing babies is a reasonable solution to the problems of “unwanted” children. By that logic, why not keep the babies and kill the older kids that are harder to foster? If death is better than being unwanted, then there is nothing morally preventing us from killing the kids we can’t foster. I don’t even want unwanted pets to die. let alone babies.
    If the question is, “What do we do about the problem of un-mentored or unwanted children?”, then I would suggest that we focus on proven solutions that don’t involve murder. Birth control, two-parent families, and abstinence might be good places to start.
    I am all for women having a choice – in fact as the article states, they have many choices. However, once you have another human living and growing inside of you, you’ve made your choice (except in the rare incidence of conception by rape, which the article addresses). Your choices now are to keep and raise your baby or give it up to one of the thousands of couples looking to adopt.
    Lastly, your argument about the “culmination” of cells was destroyed by the writer of the article already. If your argument is that without the mother, the fetus will die, then we have opened the door to infanticide. Sadly, infanticide has its proponents, though I don’t believe you are one.
    I believe you are a well-meaning person who has bought into these pro-choice arguments, as flaccid as they may be. Let me invited you over to the other side. Use your passion, wit, and intelligence for life. It’s much more satisfying to stand with those who oppose this barbaric practice than it is to stand with those who would defend ripping a baby from the protective womb of its mother and then selling it for parts.
    Come on over. I’ll leave the lights on for you.

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Parenting is not for the faint of heart

Ok so feel like I wasn't adequately warned for parenthood so - you people without children!
Do you really want to have your hands, furniture, and floor covered in someone elses poop? And not just sat nicely on the surface but thoroughly rubbed into said furniture?

The physical hardship of parenthood gets the spotlight, but you NEED to know this - the emotional and mental hardship of parenthood is 100 times worse than any poop. Just think really really hard about this parenting thing that supposed to be for everybody - lies! This should be a occupation for only the most valiant of heroes not normal people or weird people like me! Not something society pressures everyone into doing! The emotional and mental hardships, these are the ones that really get to you if you are a parent really trying your best to do this right. The worry alone is enough to give a person an ulcer.

The only reason you should be having kids is if you want a lifelong lesson is selflessness, patience, and forgiveness!


End rant